Building a Feedback Culture: From Silence to Strategic Advantage

Oct 2, 2025 | High performing teams, Leadership & culture, Organisational culture, Personal development

In many organisations, silence speaks louder than words. While leaders often say they value feedback, the reality is more complex; people withhold insights, soften the truth, or avoid difficult conversations altogether. Yet in today’s environment of complexity and rapid change, feedback is no longer optional. It’s a strategic necessity.

To unlock the full potential of individuals and teams, organisations must move from silence to a culture where courageous conversations are embedded and used to drive self-awareness, alignment, and transformation.

Silence is costly

In cultures where feedback is avoided or feared, leaders operate with blind spots, teams disengage, and growth stagnates. Colleagues hesitate to speak up out of fear of being wrong, overstepping, or causing conflict. Formal performance reviews often feel transactional or disconnected from day-to-day development. And when feedback is given, it’s either too vague to act on or too personal to process.

The cost? Misaligned expectations, missed opportunities, and a gradual erosion of openness, trust, agility, innovation and performance – the very behaviours demanded of modern leadership.

The Psychology Behind Feedback: Why It’s So Hard

Although feedback can support honesty and growth, giving and receiving feedback is difficult because it touches the core of how we see ourselves. It activates defensive reactions (anger, blaming, denial and rationalisations are common ones) that are protective by design, but counterproductive to growth. As Stone & Heen (2014) explain, we react strongly when feedback threatens the truth (“I don’t agree”), the relationship (“Why are you saying this to me?”), or identity (“This shakes my confidence”). People may also be reluctant to give feedback because of fear of negative consequences, emotional discomfort, lack of skills or practice to provide constructive feedback or even just cultural or social norms.

From a psychodynamic–systemic perspective, there are several interwoven reasons why people often resist or dislike feedback. These come from unconscious processes, group dynamics, and organisational culture. Here are some key themes:

1. Threats to the Self and Ego: Feedback can feel like a narcissistic injury and an attack on self-worth, especially if someone’s identity is closely tied to competence or achievement. In response, people unconsciously deploy defences such as denial, projection, or rationalisation to protect against the discomfort of hearing something negative. Feedback can also activate deep-seated feelings of inadequacy or fears of being “found out” (linked to the impostor syndrome).

2. Authority and Transference Reactions: Feedback givers may unconsciously represent parental, authority, or critical figures from the past, leading to exaggerated emotional responses (fear, anger, submission). There may also be the fear of punishment or rejection. Systemically, organisations may mirror family systems where criticism triggers perceptions of exclusion or loss of love, making feedback feel unsafe. And finally, feedback often carries asymmetry, those in authority give it, while subordinates receive it, which can reinforce vulnerability.

3. Anxiety and Projection: Feedback implies the need for adaptation, which threatens stability and can awaken unconscious resistance. In uncertain or volatile environments, feedback can also exacerbate existing anxieties, making people even more defensive. Rather than owning uncomfortable truths, individuals or groups may project weaknesses back onto the feedback giver (“They don’t understand me”), undermining the process.

4. Group and Organisational Norms: Evolutionarily and systemically, feedback threatens acceptance within the group; humans are wired to avoid exclusion. In some organisations or societies, feedback is equated with criticism rather than growth, creating defensive climates. Teams may also send contradictory signals (e.g., “be open to feedback” but punish mistakes), making genuine receptivity very difficult.

5. Systemic Resistances Against Feedback: In addition to individual resistances to feedback, systems often develop collective routines that protect individuals from anxiety but prevent learning. Teams may unconsciously agree not to give challenging feedback to maintain harmony, reinforcing the idea that when it is given, it must be threatening.

In short, people dislike feedback not simply because of the content, but because it touches on deep unconscious fears of rejection, loss of identity, shame, and authority conflicts, reinforced by systemic cultural patterns that can make feedback feel dangerous rather than developmental.

Reframing Feedback as a Strategic Lever

Reframing feedback as a strategic lever means shifting it from a narrow focus on individual performance correction to a collective tool for driving organisational learning, alignment, and adaptability. When leaders and teams view feedback as a source of insight into culture, collaboration, and emerging opportunities, it becomes a powerful mechanism for shaping strategy and building resilience. Instead of being reactive, feedback is integrated into daily practices and linked directly to long-term goals, making it a driver of innovation and growth rather than a moment of critique. In this way, feedback becomes less about fault-finding and more about fine-tuning the organisation to meet evolving challenges.

Building a Healthy Feedback Culture

When organisations build a feedback-positive culture, they unlock agility, trust, and development. Feedback becomes a mirror, offering insight into how our actions impact others. It creates a shared language of learning and accountability, where confronting reality is valued over protecting egos. It supports courageous leadership, helping individuals move from autopilot to authentic engagement.

A psychodynamically-informed feedback culture recognises that feedback is not simply about communication, but about unconscious processes, emotional safety, and relationships. By acknowledging defences, managing power dynamics, and embedding reflective practice, organisations can foster a culture where feedback becomes a source of growth, not threat.

The following guidelines outline a framework for establishing a feedback culture.

1. Build Psychological Safety and Containment: Feedback is best received when individuals feel safe. Leaders become powerful role models when they demonstrate openness to feedback, including admitting mistakes. Teams should also establish ground rules for respectful dialogue.

2. Focus on Development, Not Just Performance: Position feedback as growth-oriented. One simple way to do so is to balance constructive criticism with recognition of strengths. Another is to be future-oriented by framing developmental goals in terms of long-term identity and professional journey. Finally, ensure that feedback conversations support autonomy and self-efficacy, not just compliance.

3. Acknowledge the Emotional Dimensions of Feedback: Feedback is never purely rational. It touches self-esteem, identity, and unconscious dynamics. As such, recognise that receiving feedback may activate defences (denial, projection, rationalisation) and normalise strong emotions as part of the process rather than signs of resistance. Encourage curiosity about emotional responses instead of avoidance.

4. Be Mindful of Power Dynamics and Transference: Hierarchical relationships can magnify anxieties. Because it may be difficult to provide upward feedback, provide anonymity to direct reports. Supervisors should also recognise that feedback may be unconsciously experienced as parental judgment. Offer feedback in a collaborative tone, positioning it as support rather than control. Check for projections: are you reacting to the person in front of you, or to a role they represent?

5. Emphasise the Relational Aspect of Feedback: Feedback is not a transaction—it’s a relationship. Focus on dialogue through inviting reflection and shared meaning-making. Frame feedback as part of an ongoing relationship that values growth, not just assessment.

6. Use Reflective Practice and Self-Awareness: A feedback culture requires ongoing practice. Encourage self-observation: What feelings does giving or receiving feedback stir up? Provide collective spaces, such as peer or group reflection, to process emotional responses.

7. Ritualise Feedback in Organisational Life: To create culture, feedback must be consistent and embedded. Make feedback a regular practice, not an exceptional event. Encourage leaders to role model vulnerability by sharing their own reflections on feedback received. Encourage peer-to-peer as well as top-down and bottom-up feedback.

How KDVI Helps Organisations Shift the Feedback Narrative

At KDVI, we approach feedback not as a performance mechanism, but as a catalyst for personal and organisational transformation. In our work with clients, we see that feedback is often overlooked, which leaves people at a loss on how they might develop, and potentially insecure since they have no idea how others perceive them.

Our methods are grounded in psychodynamic and systemic thinking, recognising that feedback often touches unconscious patterns, emotional triggers, and long-standing narratives. Feedback serves as an entry point for deeper conversations, with the coachee playing a central role in sense-making, and the coach acting as a guide. During our coaching sessions, feedback is given in a holistic context, considering the individual, their relationships with others, as well as how the broader organisational culture influences a person’s behaviours. And finally, we consider feedback as a snapshot in time, as we are evolving constantly.

Through clinically informed 360° tools, individual and group coaching interventions, we help leaders explore not just what feedback says, but why it matters, and how to respond meaningfully. KDVI’s approach builds trust, emotional insight, and leadership courage. And that’s what drives sustainable culture change; from silence to strategic advantage.

Final Thoughts

Feedback is not easy. It takes courage to offer it and maturity to receive it. But in the space between what we say and what we hear lies the power to align, grow, and lead with authenticity.

When feedback becomes part of your culture, silence is replaced by connection, and open and courageous conversation becomes the step toward transformation.

Oriane Kets de Vries:

Oriane Kets de Vries is CEO and owner of the Kets de Vries Institute. She leads a global team of coaches, consultants and educators dedicated to developing reflective, emotionally intelligent leaders and cultivating workplaces where people can thrive. In her faculty role, she draws on extensive experience designing and directing leadership programmes for senior executives, contributing her expertise in psychodynamic coaching, organisational culture, and transformational leadership development.

Oriane has served as consultant, coach, and programme director for clients including Pictet, Deutsche Bank, Merck, UBS, Mishcon de Reya, and Engie, and she has taught on open-enrolment programmes with leading institutions such as Cambridge Judge Business School, Oxford Saïd, INSEAD, ESCP, ESMT and CEDEP. Her interests centre on the human side of leadership, particularly identity, creativity, entrepreneurship and gender dynamics. She holds an MBA and Executive MA in Coaching and Consulting for Change from INSEAD, has trained at the Harvard Kennedy School, and brings more than a decade of professional experience in creative and entrepreneurial industries into her work with leaders.

Manfred Kets de Vries:

Manfred Kets de Vries is a pioneering authority in leadership development, coaching, and organisational change. He is a founder and director of the Kets de Vries Institute (KDVI) and served as Distinguished Clinical Professor of Leadership Development and Organisational Change at INSEAD. With academic credentials in economics (University of Amsterdam), management (MBA and DBA, Harvard Business School), and psychoanalysis (trained in Canada), he brings a uniquely interdisciplinary perspective to leadership. His work bridges management theory and clinical insight, establishing him as a global thought leader in executive coaching and transformation. At INSEAD, he founded the Global Leadership Centre and led the flagship programme The Challenge of Leadership for 31 years. He also served as scientific director of Coaching and Consulting for Change, an 18-month Executive Master’s programme that has shaped over 3,000 senior leaders and executive coaches worldwide. He has advised and coached senior executives at global firms including Goldman Sachs, BP, Shell, Unilever, McKinsey, and Volvo. A prolific author of over 60 books and 400 articles, his work appears regularly in The Financial Times, The Economist, and Harvard Business Review. Recognised by Le Capital, Wirtschaftswoche, and The Financial Times as one of the world’s top 50 management thinkers, he is widely regarded for advancing more human-centred approaches to leadership.

Yulia Chupina:

Senior Adviser (Luminary) at Accenture and executive coach with over 12 years of board experience. Formerly a banker and McKinsey consultant, Yulia has led banking transformations in digital, agile, organisational change, and talent development. Her coaching spans the finance, tech, and consumer goods sectors, blending technological insight with emotional intelligence to guide leaders through transformation. Recently, she advised BBVA on agile methodologies and senior talent development. Influenced by thought leaders such as Manfred Kets de Vries and Gabor Maté, Yulia brings an analytical, reflective approach to leadership. She has lived and worked across the UK, Spain, the US, and Russia.

Elizabeth Florent:

Elizabeth has worked closely with Manfred Kets de Vries for many years and has served as a Senior Lecturer and Research Fellow at INSEAD. Her extensive background in leadership development spans organisational consulting, executive coaching, and academic research. She holds advanced degrees in Organisational Development and Clinical Organisational Psychology and is a certified Coaching Supervisor through the Tavistock Institute. Her doctoral research explored experiential domains in executive education, and she has authored or co-authored numerous academic articles, case studies, and books on leadership and organisational dynamics. Elizabeth led the development teams behind KDVI’s diagnostic instruments, including the GELM, OCA™, and ITI. Drawing on her diverse training and global experience, she brings deep cross-cultural insight to her work with leaders worldwide. Originally from California, Elizabeth has made France her home for over 30 years.